Dr. Jeff Masters' WunderBlog

Comparing the 2012 drought to the Dust Bowl droughts of the 1930s
Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 04:52 PM GMT del 16 Agosto 2012 +54
The great U.S. drought of 2012 remained about the same size and intensity over the past week, said NOAA in their weekly U.S. Drought Monitor report issued Thursday, August 16. The area of the contiguous U.S. covered by drought remained constant at 62%, and the area covered by severe or greater drought also remained constant at 46%. However, the area covered by the highest level of drought--exceptional--increased by 50%, from 4% to 6%. Large expansions of exceptional drought occurred over the heart of America's grain producing areas, in Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Missouri. The new NOAA State of the Climate Drought report for July 2012 shows that the 2012 drought is 5th greatest in U.S. history, and the worst in 56 years. The top five years for area of the contiguous U.S. covered by moderate or greater drought:

1) Jul 1934, 80%
2) Dec 1939, 60%
3) Jul 1954, 60%
4) Dec 1956, 58%
5) Jul 2012, 57%

The top five years for the area of the contiguous U.S. covered by severe or greater drought:

1) Jul 1934, 63%
2) Sep 1954, 50%
3) Dec 1956, 46%
4) Aug 1936, 43%
5) Jul 2012, 38%


Figure 1. August 14, 2012 drought conditions showed historic levels of drought across the U.S., with 62% of the contiguous U.S. experiencing moderate or greater drought, and 46% of the county experiencing severe or greater drought. Image credit: U.S. Drought Monitor.

Comparison with the great Dust Bowl droughts of the 1930s
An important fact to remember is that the 2012 drought is--so far--only a one-year drought. Recall that 2011 saw record rains that led to unprecedented flooding on the Mississippi, Ohio, and Missouri Rivers. In contrast, the great droughts of the 1950s and 1930s were multi-year droughts. The Dust Bowl drought of the 1930s lasted up to eight years in some places, with the peak years being 1934, 1936, and 1939 - 1940. Once the deep soil dries out, it maintains a memory of past drought years. This makes is easier to have a string of severe drought years. Since the deep soil this summer still maintains the memory of the very wet year of 2011, the 2012 drought will be easier to break than the Dust Bowl droughts of the 1930s were.

In addition, a repeat of the dust storms of the 1930s Dust Bowl is much less likely now, due to improved farming practices. In a 2009 paper titled, Amplification of the North American "Dust Bowl" drought through human-induced land degradation, a team of scientists led by Benjamin Cook of the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory explained the situation:

During the 1920s, agriculture in the United States expanded into the central Great Plains. Much of the original, drought-resistant prairie grass was replaced with drought-sensitive wheat. With no drought plan and few erosion-control measures in place, this led to large-scale crop failures at the initiation of the drought, leaving fields devegetated and barren, exposing easily eroded soil to the winds. This was the source of the major dust storms and atmospheric dust loading of the period on a level unprecedented in the historical record.


Figure 2. Black Sunday: On April 14, 1935 a "Black Blizzard" hit Oklahoma and Texas with 60 mph winds, sweeping up topsoil loosened by the great Dust Bowl drought that began in 1934.


The Dust Bowl drought and heat of the 1930s: partially human-caused
Using computer models of the climate, the scientists found that the Dust Bowl drought was primarily caused by below-average ocean temperatures in the tropical Pacific and warmer than average ocean temperatures in the Atlantic, which acted together to alter the path of the jet stream and bring fewer precipitation-bearing storms to the Central U.S. However, the full intensity of the drought and its spatial extent could not be explained by ocean temperature patterns alone. Only when their model included the impact of losing huge amounts of vegetation in the Plains due to poor farming practices could the full warmth of the 1930s be simulated. In addition, only by including the impact of the dust kicked up by the great dust storms of the Dust Bowl, which blocked sunlight and created high pressure zones of sinking air that discouraged precipitation, could the very low levels of precipitation be explained. The Dust Bowl drought had natural roots, but human-caused effects made the drought worse and longer-lasting. The fact that we are experiencing a drought in 2012 comparable to the great Dust Bowl drought of the 1930s--without poor farming practices being partially to blame--bodes ill for the future of drought in the U.S. With human-caused global warming expected to greatly increase the intensity and frequency of great droughts like the 2012 drought in coming decades, we can expect drought to cause an increasing amount of damage and economic hardship for the U.S. Since the U.S. is the world's largest food exporter, this will also create an increasing amount of hardship and unrest in developing countries that rely on food imports.

Jeff Masters
Categories: Drought
  Permalink | A A A
Reader Comments
Display: 0, 50, 100, 200 Sort: Newest First - Order Posted
Viewing: 1701 - 1709

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 — Blog Index

1701. clwstmchasr 02:37 PM GMT del 17 Agosto 2012    
Quoting AegirsGal:
GCC or GW is not political, it is scientific fact, and affects weather and weather patterns. It is therefore relevant to a WEATHER BLOG.


100% agree with you. But people on here will find a way to make it political.
Member Since: Luglio 29, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 2753
1702. WxGeekVA 02:37 PM GMT del 17 Agosto 2012    


Well, that escalated quickly. I'm guessing a upgrade at 5PM if it can get a little more organized.
Member Since: Settembre 3, 2011 Posts: 13 Comments: 3311
1703. WunderAlertBot (Admin) 02:39 PM GMT del 17 Agosto 2012    
JeffMasters has created a new entry.
1704. clwstmchasr 02:41 PM GMT del 17 Agosto 2012    
Quoting WxGeekVA:


Well, that escalated quickly. I'm guessing a upgrade at 5PM if it can get a little more organized.


It is amazing how quickly storms can for down there in the BOC. The curvature of the land really helps these systems spin up.
Member Since: Luglio 29, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 2753
1705. Neapolitan 02:43 PM GMT del 17 Agosto 2012    
Quoting clwstmchasr:
Dr. Masters is a huge proponent of GW and as long as he makes it part of the blog, political discussions will not go away.
That may be true, but there's a huge world of difference between posting scientific evidence of climate change and pasting a skewed and error-filled CV of a political candidate.
Member Since: novembre 8, 2009 Posts: 4 Comments: 11143
1706. Msdrown 02:44 PM GMT del 17 Agosto 2012    
Quoting Patrap:


Complete Rumor...as the Levees are a federal Project, and they have very strict Laws and restrictions.

There are numerous types of Levee's, from I-wall, to Berm to others I cant recall.

But no,, the System was designed in 67,post Betsy and completed in the 70's and most of it failed at Cat 2 Levels...when the design called for cat 3.


The US has spent 14 Billion here in the Se La. area post K on improvements that are rated to Cat 3, but thats a relative thing I believe.




Pat, Unless I missunderstood your reply,, I was talking about the levies built post Betsy that failed the money was missallocated. I know they have done a great job after K.
Member Since: Agosto 1, 2012 Posts: 0 Comments: 204
1707. SLU 02:50 PM GMT del 17 Agosto 2012    
Quoting CybrTeddy:


It's been 5 years already since Dean? I remember following Dean just as closely as we are following 94L/TD7/Gordon now. What an incredible storm, just incredible. Only storm since that which was more impressive was Igor at peak.


Dean was an amazing storm. The GFS predicted it's development 2 weeks before it even emerged off Africa.
Member Since: Luglio 13, 2006 Posts: 11 Comments: 2846
1708. AussieStorm 02:52 PM GMT del 17 Agosto 2012    
Quoting yoboi:


it's rated by storm surge not good to say it can withstand a cat 3, Ike had a storm surge as a cat 4 storm but was not rated a cat 4 at landfall....more people are killed by water in a hurricane than by wind...

Yeah I understand that. I guess the only way to find out if a system rated to withstand Cat 3 storm surge is for NOLA to be hit by a hurricane which brings cat 3 storm surge. I hope for NOLA and the Fed Govt sake, it holds up 100%. I'm guessing if anywhere did fail, the finger pointing and the blame game would start or the Fed Govt comes out and says, it was cat 4 storm surge.
Member Since: Settembre 30, 2007 Posts: 5 Comments: 13272
1709. Jedkins01 02:53 PM GMT del 17 Agosto 2012    
.
Member Since: Agosto 21, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 5322

Viewing: 1701 - 1709

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 — Blog Index

New Comment
Community Standards Policy Comments will take a few seconds to appear.
Post Your Comments
Please sign in to post comments.
Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.
About JeffMasters
Jeff co-founded the Weather Underground in 1995 while working on his Ph.D. He flew with the NOAA Hurricane Hunters from 1986-1990.

Community Activity